Showing posts with label John. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

A.D. 710

It is one of my many quirks that when I start to write about a small subject, Ruthwell Cross, located in a local area, the northern border of the Kingdom of Northumbria, I like to take a step back. For serious historians, my broad-brush stroke synopsis is probably laughable.  For me it is helpful.  I am picking a random year, say AD 710 as my anchor.

Jerusalem had become a Christian city from the 200s to the 600s. There were Jewish communities in Palestine and Syria, but Jerusalem was not one of them. In 614 Jerusalem was captured by the Persians during the Byzantine-Sasanian Wars of 602-628. The Persian troops were accompanied by Jewish forces from Galilee north of Jerusalem and forces south of Jerusalem.  Byzantium had become increasingly anti-Jewish, continuing to forbid Jews access to Jerusalem except on a very limited basis.  In this period, the concept that Jews were Christ-killers developed strong roots that would last for millennia. Byzantine rulers had persecuted and oppressed the Jews.  The combined Persian and Jewish forces besieged and captured Jerusalem without a battle.  Thousands of Christians within Jerusalem were killed, though the numbers are debatable. The Church of the Holy Sepulchre was damaged by fire and the True Cross carried off by the Persians as a war trophy.

A century before 710, the Byzantine Emperor Heraclius was crowned in 610.  He strengthen the walls of Constantinople and rebuilt the Byzantine armies, withstanding the siege of Constantinople of 626 by Avars.  As the attention of Byzantium was focused to the east, Avars and other slavs moved south of the Danube into the Balkan peninsula.  At this time, the Lombards settled in northern Italy in land that had been controlled by the Ostrogoths.

Eventually Heraclius defeated the Persians and recaptured Jerusalem in 627. As part of the peace settlement, a wooden cross, supposedly the True Cross, was returned to the Emperor Heraclius in 628.  With great celebration, the Cross was returned to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in 629 or 630.  Legend tells that Heraclius walked barefoot and carried the cross into Jerusalem.

Heraclius carrying True Cross at the gate of Jerusalem, in William of Tyre, Historia rerum in partibus transmarinis gestarum. Book made in Bourges, France about 1480. British Library Royal 15 E 1 f.16. http://www.bl.uk/IllImages/Ekta/mid/E115/E115495.jpg 

Byzantine control over Jerusalem and the Holy Land was very short-lived. The Rashidun Caliphate established after the death of the Prophet Mohammed in 632 quickly conquered the Persian Empire, Mesopotamia, the Levant including Palestine and Syria, Egypt and much of north Africa. The Caliphate took control of Cyprus, Crete, Rhodes and raided Sicily.  The successor Umayyad Caliphate continued the conquest of north Africa and Anatolia.  All the eastern two-thirds of the Mediterranean Sea and adjoining lands came under Muslim control.

In the western Mediterranean, the Visigoths had established control over the Iberian Peninsula, as well as Aquitania and the area around Toulouse.  By 710, the Kingdom of the Visigoths was fractured with internal division.  Beginning in 711, Hispania was invaded by Berber Muslims from north Africa under Tariq ibn Ziyad.  The Umayyad conquest of Hispania would be complete except for the far north and west, and extend into southern France and include much of the western coastline of what is now France.

This would have profound impact on travelers and pilgrims from the British Isles to Rome and beyond. Instead of travelling part of the journey down the Rhone valley to Marseilles and then to Ostia, the port of Rome, by ship, the traveler had to take the long overland route through the Alps. 

In 990, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Sigeric, kept a record of his trip to Rome to collect his pallium.  He recorded the churches and sites he visited Rome and then the route he took from Rome back to Canterbury. It is assumed that he took approximately the same route to Rome.[i]

Map of the locations of the some of the stops on the route of Archbishop Sigeric in year 990.

In 710, what is now France, Belgium, Netherlands and western Germany was under the Merovingian kings of Austrasia, Neustria, Swabia and the dukes of Aquitania. The remainder of south-eastern France was under the control of the Burgundians.

The Italian peninsula was divided between the Byzantine empire and the Lombards.  Constantinople controlled the Exarchate of Ravenna and the Duchy of Rome and the far south of the peninsula now Calabria, part of Campania, Basilicata and Apulia. The Lombardian kingdom controlled north Italy as well as the Duchies of Spoleto and Benevento.

Anglo-Saxon England was divided into seven kingdoms called the Heptarchy-Kent, Essex, Wessex, East Anglia, Mercia and Northumbria.  Dumnonia covered what is now Cornwall and Devon.  The Picts controlled the area north of the Firth of Forth.  There were Welsh clans, and other Celtic groups lived west of Northumbria.  In the 100 years since Augustine and his company of monks was sent by Pope Gregory, most of the Anglo-Saxon groups had become Christians following the Roman traditions though the older Celtic Christianity still survived even after the Synod at Whitby in 664. 

AD 710 was marked by continued warfare among the kingdoms. Ine of Wessex and Northelm of Sussex were campaigning against the Britons of Dumnonia. Beorhtfrith described as a prefect of Northumbria fought the Picts in what in now Scotland. Since I will spend some time discussing crosses in Northumbria, I should mention that the two northern kingdoms of the Angles, Bernicia and Deira had been more or less united for a century under the Bernician king Aethelfrith (d. c. 616) forming the kingdom of Northumbria. Aethelfrith's  daughter, Aebba, converted to Celtic Christianity while living in exile in Dal Riata, the Gaelic kingdom of western Scotland and northern Ireland. She established a nunnery about 660 at Ebchester, bringing Christianity to the previously pagan Angles.

The last half of the 500s and 600s also saw the establishment of many monasteries that would influence Christianity in the British Isles for centuries. What follows is my no means a complete list of the abbeys and the monasteries and convents associated with the abbeys. I wanted to highlight a few.

According to tradition, Iona was founded on the Isle of Mull off the west coast of Scotland about 561 by Columba and twelve companions. This monastery is usually credited with the production of the gospel Book of Kells about 800 using the Vulgate Latin translation of Jerome.

[Since the illuminations of the Evangelists and the carpet pages of most of the books that I am about to write about are so well known, I have chosen to show the illuminations for the beginning of John. John 1.1: In principio erat Verbum et Verbum erat apud Deum et Deus erat Verbum. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Most of these examples show the elaborate interlacing for which these manuscripts are renowned.]

Trinity College Dublin MS 58. The Book of Kells, f.292r.  John 1.1. It is a mostly Vulgate text. Made in a Columban monastery about 800.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8e/KellsFol292rIncipJohn.jpg
See also: http://digitalcollections.tcd.ie/home/index.php?DRIS_ID=MS58_003v

The monastery at the Holy Isle of Lindisfarne was founded off the east coast of Scotland by Aidan from Iona at the invitation of King Oswald of Northumbria about 634. Lindisfarne was also the seat of the bishop. Perhaps the most famous of the early bishop-abbots of Lindisfarne was Cuthbert (c. 634-687) whose remains are now in Durham Cathedral.  A book of the Gospel of John was founded in the coffin of St. Cuthbert when it was opened in 1104.  Cuthbert died at Lindisfarne 687 and was buried there.  In 698 the monks thought that a more important grave site was due St. Cuthbert because of the miracles ascribed to him, so his body was reinterred. 

The Gospel Book of John dates to 690-700 or so and was made during the same time period as the more famous Lindisfarne Gospels.  Some time about 700 and perhaps as early as 698, the Gospel Book of St. Cuthbert, must have been put inside the coffin. Abbot-Bishop Cuthbert’s remains and those of Abbot-Bishop Eadfrith who was the scribe for the Lindisfarne gospels were removed from the island after the Viking raid of 793 to the mainland of Northumbria, now Scotland.  Cuthbert’s bodily remains were sent to several places before coming to rest at Durham Cathedral in 995.  In 1093, the foundation stone was placed for a Norman or Romanesque cathedral at Durham.  In 1104, the shrine for St. Cuthbert’s relics was complete.  It was then that the Gospel Book was found when the coffin was opened.

 
British Library Add MS 89000. Gospel book of St. Cuthbert. f.1r Made in Northunbria
The Gospel of John was made in the late 7th or early 8th century,
http://julianharrison.typepad.com/.a/6a013488b55a86970c019b03463506970d-500wi
http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/Viewer.aspx?ref=add_ms_89000_fs001r

The most famous of the manuscripts produced at Lindisfarne was the Lindisfarne Gospels. The colophon at the end of the manuscript at f.259r, states that the manuscript was written by Eadfrith, bishop of Lindisfarne.  This dates to manuscript to sometime between 698 and Eadfrith’s death about 721.  So, for the sake of this note, one could say that the Lindisfarne Gospels were being produced in 710.
British Library MS Cotton Nero D IV. f.209v. John the Evangelist.
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/e8/0b/8c/e80b8c5f305b30f21c379e3511b45298.jpg

Intricate interlacing of carpet page for gospel of John. British Library Cotton Nero D IV f.210v.
http://imageweb-cdn.magnoliasoft.net/britishlibrary/supersize/pod87.jpg

Lindisfarne MS Cotton Nero D IV f.211r, John 1.1
http://www.oberlin.edu/images/Art315/13494.JPG

The first church founded in Kent was St. Martin’s Church. It was founded by Queen Bertha, the Christian wife of the pagan King Æthelberht about 580. This parish is still in existence and thus is one of the oldest churches in continuous use in western Europe.  When Augustine arrived in 597 he used this church as his headquarters before building the new cathedral and establishing the Abbey of St. Peter and St Paul, later named St. Augustine’s Abbey.

Roman bricks re-used (spolia) in the wall of St. Martin’s Church at Canterbury, Kent.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a9/Canterbury_St_Martin_chancel_wall.jpg/220px-Canterbury_St_Martin_chancel_wall.jpg

The church that became Canterbury Cathedral had a Benedictine Abbey adjoined to it about 995. The impetus for the foundation of the Abbey seems to have the administrative reforms of Archbishop Dunstan who died in 988.  Many manuscripts thought to have been made in southeastern England are ascribed to Christ Church Abbey.

Bishop Birinus, a Frank, was a missionary to the West Saxons initially under King Cynegils in the 635.  The king gave him Rochester to be his bishopric.  Later under King Cenwahl, the Old Minster at Winchester was founded about 650. A priory was added sometime in the 10th century and it also was a major site for manuscript production. (Much more to come on “Winchester style.”)

Most of the oldest surviving Anglo-Saxon manuscripts come from the monasteries in Northumbria. The founding of these institutions during the late 7th century provides some interest glimpses into the history of the British Isles in what is usually considered the Dark Ages.

As noted previously Benedict Biscop founded St. Peter’s Abbey in Monkwearmouth, Northumbria, in 674 on land given to him by King Egfrid or Ecgfrith. About eight years later, St. Paul’s Abbey at Jarrow was founded by twenty monks from Wearmouth including the young Bede. Jarrow is about eight miles from Wearmouth even though they are considered twin institutions. The first abbot at Jarrow was Ceolfrith. Biscop brought in stonemasons and glaziers from Francia to build the churches and buildings in stone and include glass in the windows.  As noted previously Biscop brought home books and icons and other goods from his travels to furnish the libraries of Wearmouth and Jarrow.  In the year 710, the three large bibles associated with Wearmouth-Jarrow were being made including the Codex Amiatinus that Abbot Ceolfrith was carrying to Rome when he died.  Another gospel book of which only fragments remain is the Northumbrian Gospel Book at Cambridge, Corpus Christi College 197B. It also seems to date from the 8th century and displays the same elaborate interlacing seen in the other northern bibles or gospel books except the Codex Amiantinus.

The Northumbrian Gospels, Cambridge Corpus Christi College 197B, p.247. John 1.1
http://dms.stanford.edu/image/qw038wz9710/197B_247_TC_46/small

The Abbey of St. Peter and St. Paul, later known as the Abbey of St Augustine was founded by Augustine and his accompanying monks in 598. The first five Archbishops of Canterbury were Augustine (d. 605) and the men that accompanied him, namely Laurence (d. 619), Mellitus (d. 624), Honorius (d. 653).  Then came Deusdedit who was the first native born Archbishop. Not much is known about him though he established a nunnery in Kent at the Isle of Thenet and the Peterborough Abbey. He died about 664 or so since his name does not appear among those that attended the Synod of Whitby. He may have died from the plague.  According to Bede, his successor was Wighard or Wigheard who died in Rome before his consecration of the same disease. This allowed Pope Vitalian (d. 672) to choose an Archbishop from among the clergy in Italy and to send with him a learned man to become the Abbot of St. Augustine’s Abbey.

Pope Vitalian consecrated Theodore of Tarsus in 668 as the Archbishop of Canterbury.  He was a Byzantine Greek, fluent in Greek and Latin. He brought a tradition of classical learning and scholarship to Canterbury until his death in 690.  He began his years as Archbishop by spending time conducting a survey of British churches, appointing Bishops, and instituting administrative reforms such as the division of the large diocese of Northumbria, confirming the dating of Easter, limiting movement of monks and clerics, regulating marriage and divorce, convening of regular synods, and rules “intended to insure unanimity…of orthodox beliefs.”[ii]

Theodore had a rocky working relationship with one of his bishops, Wilfred, Bishop of York.  Wilfrid became abbot at Ripon in 660.  About 664 Wilfrid was appointed to be Bishop of York.  He went to Gaul to be consecrated, staying for three years, and in his absence, another man Ceadda or Chad was appointed Bishop of York.  (Chad resigned the see and went on to become the Bishop of Mercia and Lindsey at Lichfield.) When Theodore took over as Archbishop of Canterbury he affirmed Wilfrid as Bishop of York. Bishop Wilfrid took his complaint against King Egfrid or Ecgfrith to Rome in 679. While he was in Rome, Wilfrid's signature appears on Pope Agatho’s Italian Synod of 680, representing Britain. Wilfrid won his appeal but King Ecgrith would not take him back as bishop. In the meantime, Theodore divided the Northumbrian diocese into three parts.   Wilfrid eventually regained the much smaller Bishopic of York along with the monasteries at York, Hexham and Ripon before his death in 710. There is no written information about what Wilfrid brought back from his trip(s) to Rome but, surely, he brought back at least some manuscripts. 

Archbishop Theodore was accompanied by Hadrian or Adrian.  Hadrian was north African, perhaps Berber, in descent who went to Rome probably because of the Arab Muslim conquests of north Africa. He had been to France on more than one occasion before he accompanied Theodore to Canterbury.  Hadrian was abbot of a monastery in or near Naples. When Theodore and Hadrian left Rome, they traveled by sea to Marseille before going overland. They were accompanied for most of the trip by Benedict Biscop who was returning from Rome to Northumbria.  Theodore and Hadrian made it as far as Arles in southern France before being detained by Ebroin, Mayor of the Palace of Neustria. Ebroin did assert some control over Burgundy in about 668 but it is not clear if his control extended so far south.  In any case, Theodore and Hadrian were detained and had to obtain permission to cross Neustria. This took some time so that Theodore made it only to Paris by wintertime which he spent with the Bishop of Paris. In springtime, Theodore was sent for by King Ecgberht or Egbert of Kent.  Theodore arrived in Canterbury in the spring of 669, already 67 years old. Theodore was archbishop for 21 years.

Hadrian was detained perhaps because he was north African and suspected of being a spy for the Byzantine Emperor Constans II who was living at the time at Syracuse, Sicily.  Eventually Hadrian made it north as well after spending the time with the bishops of Sens and Meaux.  He probably arrived at Canterbury a year after Theodore in 670.  Soon after his arrival, Hadrian became Abbot of the Abbey of St. Peter and St. Paul, later St. Augustine. Benedict Biscop served as Abbot in Hadrian’s place.  Once Hadrian arrived at the Abbey, he began his work as teacher and administrator. Abbot Hadrian obtained a papal privilege from Pope Agatho that prevented outside inference with the affairs of the monastery. (Ceolfirth obtained a similar letter of immunity from Pope Sergius I for Monkwearmouth-Jarrow.)  Theodore and Hadrian started the school at Canterbury that quickly became renown for the teaching of Greek and Latin. We know something of the teaching of the Old and New Testament to the students at the school thanks of a manuscript Biblioteca Ambrosiana M.79 sup. in Milan, translated as Biblical Commentaries from the Canterbury School of Theodore and Hadrian. Hadrian died in 709 or 710 after having served as abbot at Canterbury of almost 40 years.

As the late Rev Dr. Richard Pfaff pointed out in The Liturgy in Medieval England: A History, there is precious little evidence on which to base a reconstruction of the liturgical materials, bibles or gospel books available in the 7th, even early 8th century England. The Vulgate translations of the gospels in the Gospels of St. Augustine (Corpus Christi College Cambridge 286) is an Italian manuscript from the 6th century that may have accompanied the Gregorian mission to Kent.  But after that, there is not much surviving material on which to write a story about the links between the waning antique Roman and Byzantine Mediterranean cultures to the liturgical manuscripts found in the far northwestwardly British Isles.
The Gospels of St. Augustine. Cambridge, Corpus Christi College 286 f.208r, John 1
6th Century Italian Vulgate said to have accompanied Augustine to Canterbury.

The standard Biblical text in England seems to have been the Vulgate translation of the Bible. The use of the Vetus Latin or Old Latin bible seems to have persisted longer among the Irish, the pocket Gospel Book of Mulling being an example, written and illuminated in the second half of the 8th century.

Portrait of John the Evangelist holding a book and the opening page of John 1.
Book of Mulling, Trinity College Dublin, MS 60, ff. 81v-82. Second half of 8th century
https://i1.wp.com/www.tcd.ie/Library/early-irish-mss/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/082-MS60_15_LO_crop_750.gif?resize=474%2C497

One surviving link between Rome and Naples and the scriptoria of Northumbria is the British Library manuscript Royal 1 B VII. This gospel book dates to 700 to 749 and was created in Northumbria. This is a remarkably complete Vulgate translation gospel book including Jerome’s letter to Pope Damasus, Jerome’s commentaries on each of the four gospels and his prologues for each of the gospels. There are Eusebian canon tables decorated with interlacing and human, animal and bird heads. For the gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, there are list of festivals in which portions of the gospel are to be read. 

British Library MS Royal 1 B VII f.130v. John 1. Made in Northumbria about 700-749.
http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/Viewer.aspx?ref=royal_ms_1_b_vii_f130v

The gospel book Royal 1 B VII is rather unlike its elaborately decorated cousin the Lindisfarne gospels.  It has been suggested that both books derive from a now lost exemplar from Neopolitan Italy, not copied from the other. The Royal 1 B VII gospel book includes the commemoration of St. Januarius, for example. Januarius was a legendary bishop of Beneventum who was supposedly martyred during the reign of the Roman emperor Diocletian. He is a patron saint of the diocese of Naples. The commemoration appears also in to Lindisfarne gospels.  Several theories suggest that this now lost gospel book was brought by Hadrian to Canterbury when he became abbot and where Benedict Biscop might have learned of the text.  Another theory is that Benedict Biscop might have brought back a Neapolitan gospel book or bible during his book buying trips.  The third suggestion is the Ceolfrith might have brought such a book from Italy when he returned to Northumbria with Benedict Biscop.

Thus, in the year 710, two great leaders of the English Church, Bishop Wilfred and the Abbot Hadrian died. The major scriptoria of the north, Landisfarne and Wearmouth-Jarrow, and probably others in Northumbria were producing memorable manuscripts such as the Gospel Book of St. Cuthbert, Royal 1B VII, the Lindisfarne gospels, and the Codex Amiatinus.  Bede was teaching and writing at the Abbey of St. Paul at Jarrow. In another decade, he would be writing his Ecclesiastical History of the English People or Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum. Fortunately, it would be another 80 or so years before the dread Viking ship prows appeared at Lindisfarne and later Wearmouth-Jarrow and Iona. In was in this period when classical learning was contending with the artistic traditions of the Irish, Angles and Saxons, that the Ruthwell Cross and the related Bewcastle Cross were carved.
                                         




[i] Veronica Ortenburg. “Archbishop Sigeric’s Journey to Rome, 990” in Michael Lapidge, Malcolm Godden, Simon Keynes, (eds) Anglo-Saxon England 19. Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 197-246.
[ii] Michael Lapidge, “The Career of Archbishop Theodore,” in Lapidge, Michael. Archbishop Theodore: Commemorative Studies on His Life and Influence. Cambridge Univ Pr, 2006, at p. 26. 

Friday, September 11, 2015

Jesse Tree Wood: Trunk, Vine, Leaves, Flowers, and Fruit-Part 1

       About a month ago when I was writing about doves and their symbolism of the Trinity and the Gifts of the Holy Spirit, I started on a digression about wood and the legends of the True Cross.  I am coming back to the subject.  I will be repeating some of what I wrote earlier and expanding the scope.

       Jesse was the father of David (1 Samuel 16) who was anointed by Samuel to become the king of Israel and Judah after Saul.  The prophets expected the redeemer of Israel, the Messiah, to be a flesh and blood descendant of David who would restore the Davidic kingship to Israel.  This hope did not change when the northern tribes were scattered or when Judah was sent into Exile in Babylon or when Judah became Judea and Palestine under the rule of the Romans.  Even though Judah was chronically unfaithful to Yahweh, and consequently suffered invasions, losses, and exile to Babylon, Yahweh would see that Judah would never be destroyed utterly.  Out of the remnant, there would come an heir to the throne of David, a descendant of David, who would comfort his people and bring about a time of justice and righteousness.  The family tree of the Messiah would come from David.  The Messiah, the new David, would come to Judah after the long period of Exile to establish justice and peace on earth, and rule as King over Israel.

       Beginning with Biblical references to trees, branches, and rods, the most familiar reference is to Isaiah 11.1-2a.  This verse has already been cited many times.  The importance of the Davidic family tree was stressed by Pope Leo I, the Great (pope from 440-461) in his Christmas sermon, Sermon 28, On the Festival of the Nativity.  The sermon references both Isaish 11.1 and Jeremiah 23.5, he writes:

David’s Lord was made David’s Son, and from the fruit of the promised branch sprang One without fault, the twofold nature joining together into one Person, that by one and the same conception and birth might spring our Lord Jesus Christ, in Whom was present both true Godhead for the performance of mighty works and true Manhood for the endurance of sufferings.[1]

       In addition to Isaiah, there are other Old Testament references to branches and wooden staffs that the medieval mind thought were symbolically linked.  For each of the biblical references (both canonical and Apocrapha) I will include Latin, Douay-Rheims translation and the New Revised Standard Version translation for comparison.

1.     Isaiah 11.1-2a :et egredietur virga de radice Iesse et flos de radice eius ascendetet requiescet super eum spiritus Domine
a.      Isaiah 11.1-2a. And there shall come forth a rod out of the root of Jesse, and a       flower shall rise up out of his root.  And the spirit of the Lord shall rest upon       him:…
b.     Isaiah 11.1-2. A shoot shall come out from the stump of Jesse, and a branch shall grow out of his roots. The spirit of the Lord shall rest on him…

2.     Jeremiah 23.5: ecce dies veniunt ait Dominus et suscitabo David germen iustum et regnabit rex et sapiens erit et faciet iudicium et iustitiam in terra
a.      Jeremiah 23.5. Behold the days come, saith the Lord, and I will raise up to David a just branch: and a king shall reign, and shall be wise, and shall execute judgement and justice in the earth.
b.     Jeremiah 23.5: The days are surely coming, says the Lord, when I will raise up for David a righteous Branch, and he shall reign as king and deal wisely, and shall execute justice and righteousness in the land.

3.     Jeremiah 33.15-6: in diebus illis et in tempore illo germinare faciam David germen iustitiae et faciet iudicium et iustitiam in terra, in diebus illis salvabitur Iuda et Hierusalem habitabit confidenter et hoc est quod vocabit eam Dominus iustus noster
a.      Jeremiah 33. 15-6: In those days, and at that time, I will make the bud of justice to spring forth unto David, and he shall do judgment and justice in the earth. In those days shall Juda be saved, and Jerusalem shall dwell securely: and this is the name that they shall call him, The Lord our just one.
b.     Jeremiah 33. 15-6: In those days and at that time I will cause a righteous Branch to spring up for David; and he shall execute justice and righteousness in the land. In those days Judah will be saved and Jerusalem will live in safety. And this is the name by which it will be called: “The Lord is our righteousness.”

       The next scripture reference is one that is not familiar to Protestants who do not read the Apocrypha or read it only “for example of life and instruction of manners; but yet it [the church] doth not apply them to establish any doctrine.” (Article VI of the Church of England)  The reading is from Ecclesiasticus or The Wisdom of Jesus son of Sirach. 24 (verse numbers vary with different translations).  This passage from Ecclesiasticus along with Matthew 1.1-18, the genealogy of Joseph, were read on September 8, the Feast of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary. Thus the Virgin Mary is connected to images of spreading branches and vines and flowers with sweet scent and abundant fruit.

       The Feast of the Nativity or Birth of St. Mary seems to have originated in Jerusalem in the 5th century and was celebrated by the eastern (Orthodox) churches as early as the 7th century.  The feast was not celebrated in Rome until the end of the 7th century.  The feast was well established before the Schism of the eastern and western Christian churches in 1054.  The feast assumed greater importance from the 13th century onward until reduced in importance in 1955.  There is a lot more to be written about the devotion to St. Mary and the development of the Jesse Tree, but that will have to wait.

4.     Ecclesiasticus 24.22-30.  22 ego quasi terebinthus extendi ramos meos et rami mei honoris et gratiae
2          23    go quasi vitis fructificavi suavitatem odoris et flores mei fructus honoris et honestatis
2          24     ego mater pulchrae dilectionis et timoris et agnitionis et sanctae spei
2          25    in me gratia omnis vitae et veritatis in me omnis spes vitae et virtutis
2          26    transite ad me omnes qui concupiscitis me et a generationibus meis implemini
                       27 spiritus enim meus super melle dulcis et hereditas mea super mel et favum
2          28    memoria mea in generatione saeculorum
2          29    qui edunt me adhuc esurient et qui bibunt me adhuc sitient
3          30    qui audit me non confundetur et qui operantur in me non peccabunt
a.      Sirach 24.22-30. I have stretched out my branches as the turpentine tree, and my branches are of honor and grace.
23 As the vine I have brought forth a pleasant odor: and my flowers are the fruit of honor and riches.
24 I am the mother of fair love, and of fear, and of knowledge, and of holy hope.
25 In me is all grace of the way and of the truth, in me is all hope of life and of virtue.
26 Come over to me, all ye that desire me, and be filled with my fruits.
27 For my spirit is sweet above honey, and my inheritance above honey and the honeycomb.
28 My memory is unto everlasting generations.
29 They that eat me, shall yet hunger: and they that drink me, shall yet thirst.
30 He that hearkeneth to me, shall not be confounded: and they that work by me, shall not sin.
b.     Sirach 24. 16-22. 16 Like a terebinth I spread out my branches, and my branches are glorious and graceful.
17 Like the vine I bud forth delights, and my blossoms become glorious and abundant fruit.
18 [Other ancient authorities add as verse 18], I am the mother of beautiful love, of fear, of knowledge, and of holy hope; being eternal, I am given to all my children, to those who are named by him.
19 “Come to me, you who desire me, and eat your fill of my fruits.
20 For the memory of me is sweeter than honey, and the possession of me sweeter than the honeycomb.
21 Those who eat of me will hunger for more, and those who drink of me will thirst for more.
22 Whoever obeys me will not be put to shame, and those who work with me will not sin.”

          The monks who would have designed the Jesse Trees whether in manuscript or in glass, would have had the genealogy of Jesus from the gospel of Matthew linked in his mind with the luxuriant and fruitful spreading branches and vine of the passage from Ecclesiasticus.  The genealogy of Joseph from Matthew 1.1-17 was read at Christmas as well.

The calendar page for September with the Feast of the Nativity of St. Mary, Holy Cross Day Saint Matthew the Evangelist,and the Conception of John the Baptist among the dates listed.  This is from the 'Shaftesbury Psalter'with calendar and prayers,  Made in England between 1125 and 1150.  British Library Lansdowne 383 f.7.  The man at the top is thrashing and the roundel has a man holding a scale.  Libra is the zodiac sign for the end of September-October.
<http://molcat1.bl.uk/IllImages/NOF/big/011LAN000000383U00007000.jpg>


Another calendar page for September with the Feast of the Nativity of St. Mary, Holy Cross Day Saint Matthew the Evangelist,and the Conception of John the Baptist among the dates listed. This page is also from a Psalter made in central England, probably Oxford between 1200 and before 1220.  This calendar also includes the zodiac signs Libra.  The men in the upper roundel are crushing grapes. British Libary Royal 1 D X f.13.
<http://molcat1.bl.uk/IllImages/Kslides/big/K045/K045416.jpg>


       The rod or staff was a symbol of authority for the ancient Hebrews since they were a pastoral society.  Moses tended the sheep of his father-in-law Jethro. (Exodus 3.1)  The staffs of both Moses and Aaron were endowed with miraculous properties.  Aaron’s staff became a snake before Pharaoh (Exodus 7:9).  Moses raised his rod or staff before the sea and parted the waters. (Exodus 14.16).  Moses struck the rock in Horeb so that the thirsty Hebrews could have water to drink (Exodus 17.6), and again, in the wilderness of Zin so that the thirsty Hebrews and their livestock could have water (Numbers 20.9-11).  Moses made a bronze snake and put it upon a pole such that the Hebrews who had been bitten by snakes could be cured (Numbers 21.6-9).  (In typological reasoning, this story is linked to the Crucifixion along with Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac.  Those that look upon the crucified Jesus might have healing and forgiveness from their sins and receive the promise of salvation. It is also linked with the story of obedience to God to the point of sacrificing an only son, and then having God provide the sacrifice.)  
Moses strikes the rock in Horeb for water. British Library Additional 11639 f. 743.  Miscellany of biblical and other texts.  Made in central France Ile de France or Champagne, during last quarter of 13th or first quarter of 14th century. Language: Hebrew.
<http://molcat1.bl.uk/IllImMiscellany of biblical and other texts ages/BLCD/mid/c065/c06564-02.jpg>
  
       When the authority of Moses and Aaron over the Hebrews was questioned, the Lord instructed Moses to gather staffs from the leaders of the people according to their ancestors.  Moses collected and labeled 12 staffs and put them in the meeting tent before an altar referred to as “testimony” or “covenant.” (Numbers 17.4-9) When Moses went into the meeting tent the next morning, the staff of Aaron had sprouted, producing buds and blossoms, and ripe almonds. (Numbers 17:8). 

5       Numbers 17.8: sequenti die regressus invenit germinasse virgam Aaron in domo Levi et turgentibus gemmis eruperant flores qui foliis dilatatis in amigdalas deformati sunt
a.       Numbers 17.8. He returned on the following day, and found that the rod of Aaron for the house of Levi, was budded: and that the buds swelling it had bloomed blossoms, which spreading the leaves, were formed into almonds.
b.     Numbers 17.8. When Moses went into the tent of the covenant[d] on the next day, the staff of Aaron for the house of Levi had sprouted. It put forth buds, produced blossoms, and bore ripe
almonds.

Aaron's rod flowering. British Library Additional 11639 f. 519v.  Miscellany of biblical and other texts ('The Northern French Miscellany' or earlier 'the British Museum Miscellany'): including the Pentateuch, Haftarot, Tiqqun Sofrim, Five Scrolls, prayer book for the entire year with Haggadah, legal texts, poetry, calendars, Book of Tobit in Hebrew, etc.  Made in northern France, about 1277-1286. Language: Hebrew
<http://molcat1.bl.uk/IllImages/BLCD/mid/c078/c07888-06.jpg>

       Aaron’s rod was considered a symbol for the Virgin Mary who was identified with the virgin mentioned in Isaiah who give birth to a son. (Isaiah 7.14).  Just as a rod without a root produced fruit so Mary without sexual intercourse brought forth a son. 

       The rod of Aaron was probably the source for the apocryphal story about how Joseph was chosen to the guardian of the Virgin Mary as her husband.  The legend is told in Chapter 8 of Pseudo-Matthew or the Book of the Birth of the Blessed Mary and the Infancy of the Savior.

And the priest said: Tomorrow let every one who has no wife come, and bring his rod in his hand. Whence it happened that Joseph brought his rod along with the young men. And the rods having been handed over to the high priest, he offered a sacrifice to the Lord God, and inquired of the Lord. And the Lord said to him: Put all their rods into the holy of holies of God, and let them remain there, and order them to come to you on the morrow to get back their rods; and the man from the point of whose rod a dove shall come forth, and fly towards heaven, and in whose hand the rod, when given back, shall exhibit this sign, to him let Mary be delivered to be kept. On the following day, then, all having assembled early…the high priest went into the holy of holies, and brought forth the rods. And when he had distributed the rods, and the dove came forth out of none of them,… And the angel of the Lord appeared to him, saying: There is here the shortest rod, of which you have made no account: you brought it in with the rest, but did not take it out with them… [T]he high priest cried out to [Joseph] with a loud voice, saying: Come, Joseph, and receive your rod; for we are waiting for you. And Joseph came up trembling... But as soon as he stretched forth his hand, and laid hold of his rod, immediately from the top of it came forth a dove whiter than snow… flew towards the heavens. [2]

       This legend of Joseph gets another version in the 11th century Libellus de Nativitate Sanctae Mariae and the 13th century Legenda Aurea.  In the Book of the Birth of Saint Mary, Chapter 8 tells a similar legend to the one in Pseudo-Matthew.  “Joseph, therefore, was found out.  For when he had brought his rod, and the dove came from heaven; and settled upon the top of it, it clearly appeared to all that he was the man to whom the virgin should be espoused.”[3]

       In the Legenda Aurea under the Nativity of Our Blessed Lady, the legend is written “then Joseph by the commandment of the bishop brought forth his rod, and anon it flowered, and a dove descended from heaven thereupon, so that it was clearly the advice of every man that he should have the virgin.”[4]

       The Libellus along with Pseud-Matthew were the foundation of a popular poem probably written by Robert Wace in Anglo-Norman dated to about 1130-1140 or so and thus predates the influential Legenda Aurea compiled and written in the 13th century.  Entitled Conception Nostre Dame, this version of the legend adds that Joseph’s rod flowered as well as produced a dove.[5]  It is this story that is picked up in the Legenda Aurea, mentioned just above.

       The figure became more dense.  Mary was the vine and Jesus the flower or fruit of the vine.  This was yoked to the image of Jesus as the true vine from John 15.1-6.

       Jesus told a number of parables about vineyards.  The parable of the man who planted a vineyard and let it out of wicked tenants appears in all three synoptic gospels, Matthew 21.34-43, Mark 12. 1-12, and Luke 20.9-16.  There is the parable of the Laborers in the Vineyard who were hired at different hours of the day in Matthew 20.1-16.  Also in Matthew is the parable of the two sons sent to the vineyard to work. One said “No” at first but then repented.  The second agreed to go but never showed up for work. (Matthew 21.28-32)  The parable concludes with Jesus challenging the crowd, “Which of the two did the will of his father?”  Luke adds a parable on the topic of repentance that is about a man who planted a fig tree in his vineyard that failed to produce figs.  The owner ordered the fig to be cut down but the vinedresser asks for another year to see if with manure and cultivation the fig might produce fruit. (Luke 13.6-9)  Though none of these parables are told in the gospel of John, it is John that sums up all the parables in John 15.1-6.

6       John 15.1-6: ego sum vitis vera et Pater meus agricola est
2 omnem palmitem in me non ferentem fructum tollet eum et omnem qui fert fructum purgabit eum ut fructum plus adferat
3 iam vos mundi estis propter sermonem quem locutus sum vobis
4 manete in me et ego in vobis sicut palmes non potest ferre fructum a semet ipso nisi manserit in vite sic nec vos nisi in me manseritis
5 ego sum vitis vos palmites qui manet in me et ego in eo hic fert fructum multum quia sine me nihil potestis facere
6 si quis in me non manserit mittetur foras sicut palmes et aruit et colligent eos et in ignem mittunt et ardent
a.         John 15.1-6.  I am the true vine; and my Father is the husbandman.
2 Every branch in me, that beareth not fruit, he will take away: and every one that beareth fruit, he will purge it, that it may bring forth more fruit.
3 Now you are clean by reason of the word, which I have spoken to you.
4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, unless it abide in the vine, so neither can you, unless you abide in me.
5 I am the vine: you the branches: he that abideth in me, and I in him, the same beareth much fruit: for without me you can do nothing.
6 If any one abide not in me, he shall be cast forth as a branch, and shall wither, and they shall gather him up, and cast him into the fire, and he burneth.
b.         John 15.1-6. “I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinegrower.
2 He removes every branch in me that bears no fruit. Every branch that bears fruit he prunes to make it bear more fruit.
3 You have already been cleansed by the word that I have spoken to you.
4 Abide in me as I abide in you. Just as the branch cannot bear fruit by itself unless it abides in the vine, neither can you unless you abide in me.
5 I am the vine, you are the branches. Those who abide in me and I in them bear much fruit, because apart from me you can do nothing.
6 Whoever does not abide in me is thrown away like a branch and withers; such branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned.

Initial
 Opening lines of the Gospel of John "In principio erat Verbum et Verbum erat apud Deum et Deus erat Verbum" with red penwork "I." British Library Harley 276   f. 2v . Gospel of John was made in England between 1200 and 1250. 
<http://molcat1.bl.uk/IllImages/BLCD/big/C128/C12861-09.jpg>

More about wood and the Legend(s) of the True Cross in Part II.




[1] <http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf212.ii.v.xvi.html>
[2] < http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf08.vii.v.ix.html>
<http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0848.htm>
[3] The Gospel of the Nativity of Mary. Chapter 8. <http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf08.vii.vi.viii.html>
[4] <http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/basis/goldenlegend/GoldenLegend-Volume5.asp#Nativity of our Blessed Lady>
[5] Jean Blacker, Glyn S. Burgess, Amy Ogden tr.and ed.  “Conception Nostre Dame” in Wace, The Hagiographical Works: The Conception Nostre Dame and the Lives of St Margaret and St Nicholas. (2013) Leiden. Brill. Pp.11-145.
Maureen Barry McCann Boulton. Sacred Fictions of Medieval France: Narrative Theology in the Lives of  Christ and the Virgin-1150-1500. (2015) Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.